Skip to main content

What are the differences between AC-MXNET switches, and how do I choose the right one?

Comparison between different MXNet Switch models and example applications for each

Written by Isaiah

Understanding AC-MXNET Switches: Differences and Recommendations

AC-MXNET switches are designed to support various deployment scenarios, offering flexibility and scalability for different system requirements. This article outlines the key differences between the AC-MXNET-SW48E, SW48P, SW24E, and SW24P models and provides recommendations for selecting the right switch for your needs.

Key Differences Between AC-MXNET Switch Models

AC-MXNET-SW48E (Essential)

  • Ports: 48

  • Features: Supports USP, 1G V1/V2, and Dante.

  • Use Case: Cost-effective option for typical USP or single-switch 1G deployments. Not intended for stacking multiple switches. Ideal as a Dante switch where MXNet is not used.

  • Scalability: Limited; not suitable for future expansion or stacking.

AC-MXNET-SW48P (Pro)

  • Ports: 48

  • Features: Supports USP, 1G V1/V2, and Dante. Includes 25G SFP28 uplinks, 396 Gbps switching capacity, and PoE++.

  • Use Case: Recommended for larger 1G systems, scenarios requiring stacking or future scalability, or as a full Layer 3 switch in Dante-only environments.

  • Scalability: High; suitable for stacking and future expansion.

AC-MXNET-SW24E

  • Ports: 24

  • Features: Supports 1G Evolution II.

  • Use Case: Suitable for single-switch deployments with no need for stacking and under 24 total ports.

  • Scalability: Limited; not designed for stacked deployments.

AC-MXNET-SW24P

  • Ports: 24

  • Features: Supports 1G Evolution II with 10G uplinks for bandwidth headroom.

  • Use Case: Ideal for 1G Evolution II designs where expansion beyond a single switch may be required.

  • Scalability: High; supports stacked deployments.

Deployment Recommendations

  1. Single-Switch Deployments: - For systems under 24 ports with no need for stacking, choose the AC-MXNET-SW24E. - For systems requiring up to 48 ports without stacking, the AC-MXNET-SW48E is a cost-effective choice.

  2. Stacked or Scalable Deployments: - For 1G Evolution II designs requiring future scalability, select the AC-MXNET-SW24P. - For larger systems or those requiring advanced features like PoE++ and 25G uplinks, the AC-MXNET-SW48P is recommended.

  3. Dante-Only Environments: - Use the AC-MXNET-SW48E for cost-effective setups where MXNet is not required. - Opt for the AC-MXNET-SW48P for full Layer 3 functionality and scalability.

Summary of Technical Specifications

By understanding the differences and capabilities of each AC-MXNET switch model, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your system requirements and future scalability needs.

Did this answer your question?